Search for: "FIELDS v. USA" Results 221 - 240 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 4:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “David owns Hologram USA—Pulse’s competitor in the field of human animation. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 10:00 pm
Kaz USA, Inc. 2016-2315, 2016-2341 (Fed Cir. 2018) (nonprecedential). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
This principle was applied to the press in R v Crook (1991) 93 Cr App R (2) 37 in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
”  Joan Biskupic has an account of yesterday’s proceedings in USA Today. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Courts often disagree, and in effect, seek to limit the field. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Aaron Mackey
Prosecutors may view creation of an app that makes it safer for sex workers out in the field the same way. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Joa, Inc. v Fameccanica Data SpA [2017] EWHC 1251 (IPEC), particularly considering the new trend to include added matter in the pleading point of patent cases.SugarHero and the Snow Globe Cupcakes - Copyright and Food VideosMathildelets us know about the recent filing of a copyright infringement claim by internet chef Elizabeth LaBau (known as SugarHero) against Television Food Network, relating to LaBau's cooking video of her flagship recipe “Snow Globe Cupcakes”.Mr… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
PHOTOS: President Trump's Mount Rushmore speech"We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776 [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:16 am by Daniel J. Rosenthal
Taken together, FISA’s provision regarding release of FISA information in certain narrow circumstances and the USA FREEDOM Act’s disclosure provision demonstrate that Congress speaks with precision when it seeks to regulate the release of FISA information. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]