Search for: "Federal Employment Law Insider" Results 221 - 240 of 2,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 3:53 am by Dan Frith
A recent ruling by a federal district judge in Roanoke is a big WIN for the employee in a case with non-compete issues. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:19 am by HR Hero Alerts
Keep up with the latest legal changes in employer benefits with the Benefits and Compensation Law Alert and with changes in federal employment laws in the Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:28 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Eight Years Later: Three Big Changes in Employment Law – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Doing the “Two Step”: Court Grants Stage One Conditional Certification Of EPA Collective Action – Gerald L. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 11:02 am by Anthony Zaller
  The post Five Common Exempt Classifications Under California Law appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:29 pm by Arnstein & Lehr
He comments that employers must carefully consider whether to require the disclosure of passwords even in unregulated states, as they may face a privacy lawsuit; the employer must also consider the risk of obtaining knowledge of a protected characteristic or medical condition that could lead to allegations of discrimination under federal, state or local laws. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 2:00 am by Sara Nasseri, Fortney & Scott, LLC
Sara Nasseri is an associate with Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, D.C. and contributor to Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 2:00 am by Sara Nasseri, Fortney & Scott, LLC
Sara Nasseri is an associate with Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, D.C. and contributor to Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 2:00 am by Sara Nasseri, Fortney & Scott, LLC
Sara Nasseri is an associate with Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, D.C. and contributor to Federal Employment Law Insider. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:39 pm by Anthony Zaller
The post Five lessons for California employers from $6 million verdict against Walmart appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 6:19 pm by Cindi
It includes cases involving breach of contract, employment discrimination, and other civil disputes. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:13 am by Jon Hyman
[Image courtesy of Robin Shea’s Employment & Labor Insider]       Related StoriesSex stereotyping as transgender discriminationLGBT rules for federal contractors now in effectOSHA and pro sports—are concussions the NFL’s black lung? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This case serves as a reminder for employers that even though an employee's religious beliefs may seem strange, as long as those beliefs are sincerely held, the law requires that employers accommodate them absent undue hardship. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm by Daniel Schwartz
  Whether it "should" or not, its federal counterpart recently engaged in a similar program -- albeit with employment law practitioners. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:26 am by Maribeth Meluch
However, employers are still free to implement policies that: Prohibit all firearms and other weapons inside their buildings and vehicles. [read post]
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) prohibits harassment and discrimination in the workplace that is based on one or more of the categories commonly protected by local, state and federal discrimination laws. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
They claim that federal law entitled them to a minimum of 60 days' notice. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:45 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
The measures in H.R. 1628 that affect employers are relatively uncontroversial, according to Eric Schillinger, a contributor to Federal Employment Law Insider and an attorney at Trucker Huss. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:31 am by Benson Varghese
If you are not in custody, the interview will be conducted inside the jail. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:50 am
"There's also an argument that if federal law does preempt state law, it's a taking within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment and the federal government owes just compensation. [read post]