Search for: "Georgia Pacific, Inc."
Results 221 - 240
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 5:07 pm
The investigation is based on an April 19, 2010 complaint and May 10, 2010 letter supplementing the complaint filed by Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP of Atlanta, Georgia alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain electronic paper towel dispensing devices and components thereof that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:12 pm
MeiklejohnReconsidering Reasonable Royalty Damages Methodology in Patent Infringement Suits: Supplementing Georgia Pacific with the Reasonable Royalty Determination Board - Erick S. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:35 am
Lansa, Inc., 594 F.3d 860 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Obama Administration tells Senate it supports patent reform changes (IP Watch) Patent Reform Act has false marking in its sites (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Patent reform that hurts small inventors and small businesses (Inventive Step) Department of Commerce white paper supports patent reform (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (Patently-O) US Patents Northern District of Illinois is a top patent district any way you slice it (Chicago… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:46 pm
On April 19, 2010, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (“Georgia Pacific”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Georgia argument 1/13/2010 Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
” We expect that this proposed reform bill will not alter the traditional role of the Georgia-Pacific factors, which have been used in the reasonable royalty analysis, or other established damages law. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Pacific Investment Management Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:35 pm
David did not provide any link between the re-bundling licenses and the first factor of the Georgia-Pacific analysis. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
David, a qualified economist with experience in the field, followed the traditional application of the Georgia-Pacific factors, see Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
The first Georgia-Pacific factor: 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm
Lansa, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
See Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
The CAFC cited Georgia-Pacific:To support his royalty calculation, Wagner adjusted the baseline royalty rate of ($96) using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Digital Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
Inc., 2009 WL 4730622(E.D.Tex. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
" (quoting Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
