Search for: "In re: G-I Holdings, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Res. 574 by a vote of 231 to 187, holding Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm by Barry Sookman
Schad, 2016 ONSC 2297 Online Agreements Starkey v G Adventures, Inc. 796 F.3d 193 (2nd.Cir. 2015) Long v Provide Commerce, Inc 245 Cal. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am by Jason M. Halper
  Rather, the compelling justification concept articulated by Chancellor Allen in Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
Arnold J agreed with this position, holding that Swift did not disclose feature (f).The judge held that, in so far as feature (f) was concerned, it was not obvious to re-design the system in Swift to operate with the doors shut. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  “[G]iven the government’s boundless interpretation of the All Writs Act, it is hard to conceive of any limits on the orders the government could obtain in the future. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
I will note that none of the parties cited Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
’ In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation, 536 F.3d 1049 (U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
G Adventures If You’re Going To Incorporate Online T&Cs Into a Printed Contract, Do It Right–Holdbrook v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
§ 922(g)(9), prohibiting gun possession by persons convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
If that caption sounds familiar to you, then you’re either one of the two petitioners or you’re lying. [read post]