Search for: "In re: World Imports Ltd" Results 221 - 240 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Cairns is being compared to disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong after bringing shame on the cricket world. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am by MBettman
Wolfe, Of Counsel to Rinehart, Rishel & Cuckler, Ltd., Columbus, for Appellee Christine Marie Whetstone, Individually And as Parent and Natural Guardian and Next Friend of O.C. and L.C., Minors. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
King ruled that Warner/Chappell was not the owner of the copyright in the lyrics to the world’s most popular song. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
King ruled that Warner/Chappell was not the owner of the copyright in the lyrics to the world’s most popular song. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The motion judge instead relied on Morguard Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by INFORRM
He was still doing work for the News of the World until his re-arrest in 2008. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, 52 O.R. (2d) 799 (note), 17 Admin. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
During those four days, Fillery was given the opportunity to manage the first interview under caution with Rees, and to take possession of key incriminating files from the premises of Southern Investigations Ltd, including Daniel’s diary, which has never since been found. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
Sept. 24, 2007) (excluding engineering opinion that defective wood-carving tool caused injury because of lack of error rate) In re Ephedra Products Liability Litigation, 393 F. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am by Tamsin Blow, Olswang LLP
This builds on the cases of Campbell v MGN Ltd in the House of Lords and In re Guardian News and Media Ltd in the Supreme Court, that the right to convey information to the public includes the right to choose the language in which it is conveyed. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Essentially Lord Neuberger had some sympathy with the approach but not enough to reverse a century of settled English law.South Africa: Caterham Car Sales & Coachworks Ltd v Birkin Cars (Pty) Ltd which is similar to ConAgra [43]Hong Kong: Ten-Ichi Co Ltd v Jancar Ltd which however is contradicted by a more recent decision of the Court of Final Appeal in In re Ping An Securities Ltd [44]Singapore: Several cases were discussed, but the leading… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
More important, however, the Manual appears to be wrong that epidemiologic studies cannot identify acceleration of onset of a particular disease in an epidemiologic study or clinical trial. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Barry Sookman
See, Chris Castle, World Watch:  Canadian Government Closes Big Tech’s Back Door Loophole. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
  The validity of the patent was sustained in a director-ordered re-exam. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * "Fool's errand": no need to create your own brand if you can use someone else's Jeremy notes Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA Civ 54 [on which see earlier katpost here], a trade mark infringement decision of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, on parallel importation and over-stickering of pharmaceutical products. [read post]