Search for: "Lacks v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 221 - 240
of 446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
Background This case concerns the alleged maladministration of a GP’s practice in Northern Ireland and its implications on the correct interpretation of the powers of Northern Ireland’s Commissioner of Complaints. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:00 am
An 18-year delay by the State Division of Human Rights in issuing its determination characterized as being “jurisprudentially intolerable”Matter of New York State Dept. of Correction and Community Supervision v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 137 AD3d 1512, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn August 1995 Kenneth W. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
The consensus statement makes some pedestrian pronouncements about the difference between statistical and clinical significance, about the need for other considerations in addition to statistical significance, in supporting causal claims, and the lack of bright-line distinctions for statistical significance in assessing causality. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
It reflects the public’s lack of understanding about the issue, but more importantly, the public’s priorities. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court to correct this injustice and overreach of copyright law. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
Commissioner of Correction, supra. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
