Search for: "Matter of Stanford"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 4:09 pm
The first rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure exhorts the “just, speedy and inexpensive” resolution of matters. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Ablavsky, who holds a Ph.D. in history, is the Marion Rice Kirkwood Professor of Law at Stanford Law School and Allread, JD ’22, is a Ph.D. candidate in history at Stanford University and a member of the Choctaw Nation. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
And that is wise, because there are times and places where institutional speech on matters of public concern is warranted. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Jayanta Bhattacharya (Stanford University) and Martin Kulldorff (Harvard University). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 10:34 am
No matter the reason, a response that is out of bounds is still out of bounds. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That someone becomes frustrated by heckling and changes their planned talk in response (as Judge Duncan apparently did, turning from prepared comments to a remarkably combative Q&A period) is simply not a matter of being shouted down. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
At the close of business on Good Friday, federal judge Matthew Kacsmaryk released a ruling in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine vs. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
In response to the disruption of Judge Duncan’s remarks, Jenny Martinez, Dean of Stanford Law School, penned a 10-page letter to the SLS community explaining why what some students did ran afoul of Stanford’s free-speech policy, why the actions by those students were not protected by the First Amendment (assuming that Stanford, a private university, should respect First Amendment rights the same way a public university would have to, either as a matter… [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am
“Observance of this duty matters most, not least, when we are convinced that others haven’t. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
"That is a matter of judgment and degree. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:36 am
Writes Vesuviano in the most-liked comment at the NYT on the article "At Stanford Law School, the Dean Takes a Stand for Free Speech. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 7:49 am
Similarly, in the outrageous shouting down of an appellate judge at Stanford Law School, the Dean voiced support for free speech but refused to sanction any of the students responsible for the disruption. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 5:44 am
Stanford was not adequately prepared.... [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center DSA represents a shift to operational mandates compared to DMCA, Art. 17—thoughts? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new rules. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 9:50 am
Here, Stanford Law Professor David A. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:02 am
But the theory does not matter. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 12:05 am
Saturday: This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts New York Times Publishes Tool To Produce The Only College Ranking That Matters: Yours Hemel: New York’s Child Tax Credit Choice Will The ABA And California Bar Get Involved In The Stanford Law School Free Speech Imbroglio? [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In the popular culture, the idea is that factual assertions or beliefs are, in principle, demonstrably true or false, whereas moral beliefs are neither true nor false, but simply matters of opinion and culture or the products of relations of power and subordination. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:55 am
We rejected no-fault monopolization to reward innovation, but structure matters. [read post]
