Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 221 - 240
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Grant, counsel for the Indiana Electrical Workers about the about the purpose of its § 220 complaint. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
The police’s judgment should be given credence when weighing up whether to allow NCND or grant PII. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
The police’s judgment should be given credence when weighing up whether to allow NCND or grant PII. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:56 am
Accordingly, it affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the retailer (Adamson v Walgreens Co, April 29, 2014, Stahl, N). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied in part and granted in part (Norman v Bright Horizons Family Solutions, LLC, January 23, 2014, Kovachevich, E). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Oct. 7, 2013), the court found that the defendant had a duty to preserve relevant emails that came from the personal email accounts of its former officers because it “presumably knew” that the officers used these accounts to conduct company business. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:06 am
While working on the memo, the firm contacted no officers or directors of client other than the general counsel and the factual basis of the opinions in the memo were based on the general counsel’s declarations. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:29 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
Shepherd v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
The court granted the motion, resulting in a default order that identifies Prenda Law, John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, and Paul Duffy as "aliases" of AF Holdings.1 Last week Chowdhury followed up with a request that the Court enter a final judgment based on the default order. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:36 pm
” Allen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm
In determining whether to grant or deny an eligible defendant resentencing, CPL §440.46 (3) directs that the court may consider defendant's participation in treatment or other programming while incarcerated and such person's disciplinary history. [read post]
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
" Matter of Allen v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
A disciplinary panel of the Arizona Supreme Court disbarred the elected prosecutor of Maricopa County for using his office to punish political opponents. 10. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Plenty of disciplinary cases this past week, but the most interesting one, especially for Ohio State fans, is Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
