Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 221 - 240 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The focus of the paper is on the law of patents, with particular emphasis on leading appellant decisions from U.S. and Canadian courts. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
That decision was upheld by the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham asked the letting agents, and the Environmental Health department of Thanet District Council, who said, variously, that the property had had a lot of remedial work over the year before Mr B left, the remaining deficiencies were minor, and that Mr B had not been asked to leave. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Birmingham asked the letting agents, and the Environmental Health department of Thanet District Council, who said, variously, that the property had had a lot of remedial work over the year before Mr B left, the remaining deficiencies were minor, and that Mr B had not been asked to leave. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
The appellant was employed as a consultant forensic psychologist by the respondent, and was alleged to have breached patient confidentiality. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The Labor Department asserted that several statutes, including the Federal Procurement Act and Title VII, provided the requisite grants of legislative authority by Congress for the regulations at issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. 1st District.Knowing when to concede error is vital:Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintaining frivolous defense to appealM.B., Appellant, vs. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
Defendant filed an appeal, pro se at the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:54 am
The Appellate Division said that the Kelly respondents “failed to meet their burden of providing competent evidence rebutting [Ginther’s] medical evidence that she suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression following her service as a police officer at the World Trade Center site from September 12, 2001 until November 28, 2001. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  Furthermore, the Court emphasized that the company’s statistical method was called for in the trial protocol, and was selected before the data were unblinded and provided to the company.[18] In Kleinman v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division, First Department Child Support - Award - CSSA - Shared Custody - First Department Rejects Rule Established in Baraby That in an Equally Shared Custody Case the Parent Who Has the Greater Income Should Be Considered the Noncustodial Parent for Purposes of Support In Rubin v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:15 am by S2KM Limited
The New York State Court of Appeals (Court of Appeals), New York's highest judicial authority, has denied a Motion for Leave to Appeal a February 6, 2013 decision bythe Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department which rejected a legal challenge by Executive Life of New York (ELNY) structured settlement shortfall payees to the ELNY Order of Liquidation and Approval of the ELNY Restructuring Agreement signed by New York State Supreme… [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In the final days of the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court granted review in Home Star Bank & Financial Services v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
  Michigan Department of Community Health v. [read post]