Search for: "State of Maine v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Arguments In their brief on the merits, the subsidiaries make three main arguments. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
As Professor Maryam Jamshidi noted at Just Security, it seems that the main target of Iran’s action is not Canada but the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
However, a majority of the United States Supreme Court did not buy it, and in late 2008, issued its opinion in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm
An association and several individuals who regularly use the Trail for recreating and hunting, and who support wildlife conservation (Scarborough Citizens) brought suit against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and its Northeast Regional Director, as well as the Governor of Maine and the Commissioners of the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (IFW) and Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Maine, 527 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:36 pm
Some of the terrorist groups tracked by the United States have also targeted Russia for years, among them the Islamic State. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:03 pm
See Morales v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Exactly 92 years after the infamous Buck v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Joining Massachusetts in the motion to intervene were the states of Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, and the City of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am
Personnel records allowed me to establish that Onondaga Pottery had hired a young scientist, Edward Schramm, in the 1930’s, from the United States Bureau of Standards. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
In Guilmette v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
The case is DiCosolo v. [read post]
