Search for: "State v. Mathew" Results 221 - 240 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Finally, Mathews put up an insightful post stating how Section 27 of Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 allows filing of rectification application on a ground of public interest as per the Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Ass'n; Bryan Babb and Mathew Klein of Indianapolis, IN. [read post]