Search for: "State v. Romero" Results 221 - 240 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells Bennett linked us to video of yesterday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305, 320 (1982). [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “Federal prosecutors in D.C. said Romero Cabral Da Costa Neto, 33, of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was arrested on Tuesday in Washington, D.C., by agents with the FBI’s Washington Field Office. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:15 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Ejemplo de un derecho adquirido son las escoltas de los ex gobernadores (Hernández, Romero v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]