Search for: "State v. Syed"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 12:16 pm
Wilco Sys., Inc. 27 A.D.3d 169 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Nihon relied on a Massachusetts case (AFC Cable Sys. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 7:20 am
Reporters v State of New York Unified Ct. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 12:15 am
See e.g., Greenlight Sys., LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:28 am
Canon Computer Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm
Sys., Inc., 572 U.S. 559, 564, 134 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Social Security Administration’s disability determination not binding on a public retirement system of this State.Fusco v Teachers' Retirement Sys. of the City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 00782, Appellate Division, First Department Kimberly Fusco appealed the New York City Teachers’ Retirement System’s [System] denial of her application for accidental disability retirement benefits.., unanimously affirmed, without costs.The Appellate Division sustained the… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
Sys., Inc. v Belessis [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Terry v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:54 am
In Berkley Assurance Company v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
Sys. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am
United States, 195 F.2d 433, 436 (10th Cir.1952); see also, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
Cir.2006); Genetic Implant Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
Sys., Inc., 569 F.3d 1328, 1331(Fed. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:46 pm
Hydrotech Sys., Inc., 109 F.3d 1567, 1572 (Fed. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:42 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158… [read post]