Search for: "US Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill" Results 221 - 240 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
  And even in law, there are limits to this adversarial system. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Christ Church in Savannah, Georgia, GA; Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Georgia, Inc., The Episcopal Church, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Libel and Privacy Trials this Term in Northern Ireland There are four libel jury trials listed in Northern Ireland this term: 20 January 2014, O’Kane v Sunday Newspapers and Campbell v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 4 days 23 January 2014, Loony v Hanna 10 February 2014, Patterson v Ministry of Defence, Time estimate, 10 days 12 February 2014, Watson v Sunday Newspapers, Time estimate, 3 days We thank Olivia O’Kane of… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
IMS Health Inc. (2011) (the commercial expression case) and the plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The developers named as real parties are Solargen Energy, Inc., Solargen Energy DE, PV2 Energy, LLC, PF2 Energy Holdings, LLC, and Nevo Energy, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Colorado permits enforcement of this law, Hill should be limited or overruled. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hill, Holliday, Connors, Cosmopulos Inc., 228 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2000) (holding that material issues of fact existed as to whether use of the slogan “Swing Swing Swing,” playing off of the trademarked song title “Sing Sing Sing (with a Swing),” was fair use, notwithstanding holding that the slogan was not used as a mark); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Wanted to reform statutory damages, reform fair use, deal with false DMCA takedowns, and limit the copyright term. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  That trend is one we hope and expect will continue, due in part to the effect of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  If the other important Bradford Hill factors are present – dose-response, consistent, coherence, etc. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am by Schachtman
  The court parsed the statute to suggest that the term “increased risk” is more precise and limited than the umbrella term of “risk,” standing alone. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, Chemical Express Carriers, Inc. v. [read post]