Search for: "United Energy Corp. v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
” Communications to or from federal, state, local or tribal government employees, who are U.S. persons or located in the United States, will not be intentionally selected and if inadvertently retrieved treated in accordance with the above rules regarding domestic communications/U.S. persons communications. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Guarini Center on Environmental, Energy, and Land Use Law, New York University School of Law—Strategies for Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Global Supply Chains. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Army Corps of Engineers, would dramatically reverse its position and grant most of the relief requested by the tribe. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:22 am by Schachtman
” Fletcher at *3 (citing Metavante Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
(Compl., 25-32.)Defendants move to dismiss the case for improper venue, or in the alternative, transfer the case to the United States District Court of Connecticut.Fragola v. [read post]