Search for: "Watts v. Howes" Results 221 - 240 of 346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 11:54 am
”In coming to his conclusions, Hackland noted the wife’s description of her feelings about her life, including how she “used to wait for spring” how she was “sickened” and “very afraid. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
The legal publisher knows who is interested in the publication and how many of them are likely to purchase a new edition. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Horatia Muir Watt is Professor of Law at Sciences Po Law School I. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
Shapiro examined how oath-taking by witnesses interacted with the oaths of grand jurors and petit jurors as well as with oath-taking outside the legal setting. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Watts thought the EEOC was really “feeling its oats” and pushing the envelope, if the allegations are true. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm by Marta Requejo
Clemens Feinäugle (MPI Luxembourg) started by presenting how the reasoning of the judgment relates to the general principles of jurisdiction in public international law. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” Does the Nassar ruling affect how he advises his employer clients? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am by Mischa Popoff
” Book sits in a chair that was once occupied by none other than Miles V. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
(“Daubert II”)(holding that for epidemiological testimony to be admissible to prove specific causation, there must have been a relative risk for the plaintiff of greater than 2) (“For an epidemiological study to show causation under a preponderance standard … the study must how that children whose mothers took Bendectin are more than twice as likely to develop limb reduction birth defects as children whose mothers did not. [read post]