Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
’836 patent col. 7 ll. 41–44. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:14 am
Helmets are known to reduce head injuries for motorcycle riders by 37 percent and by 41 percent for passengers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am
His books are worthy of study: 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:13 pm
It is not immediately clear, however, what purpose would be served by staying discovery pending a plaintiff’s Rule 41 motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm
¶41. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:08 am
§ 41-1-80 states: “no employer may discharge or demote any employee because the employee has instituted [in good faith]. . . [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:08 am
§ 41-1-80 states: “no employer may discharge or demote any employee because the employee has instituted [in good faith]. . . [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:08 am
§ 41-1-80 states: “no employer may discharge or demote any employee because the employee has instituted [in good faith]. . . [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Since the procedure before the CJEU (unlike ECtHR) does not allow participation of third parties, the broad coalition of organisations is now publicly addressing an open letter to the CJEU demonstrating that general requirement of password protection of open wireless would constitute an obstacle to legitimate trade (Art. 3(2) of the Enforcement Directive, Article 41(1) TRIPS Agreement) and should be outlawed. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
The judge goes on to explain that[t]o prevail on a claim of 1st Amendment Retaliation, it must be shown that: 1) the conduct was protected, 2) an adverse action was taken against that conduct that would deter a person of ordinary firmness to engage in that conduct, and 3) there is a causal connection between the conduct and the adverse action. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 10:34 pm
Since the procedure before the CJEU (unlike ECtHR) does not allow participation of third parties, the broad coalition of organizations is now publicly addressing an open letter to the CJEU demonstrating that general requirement of password protection of open wireless would constitute an obstacle to legitimate trade (Art. 3(2) of the Enforcement Directive, Article 41(1) TRIPS Agreement) and should be outlawed. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
At 1:03, the officer handcuffs Taylor. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
The record does not reflect that Davis's deed was recorded. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:41 am
Not only does the proposed implementation fail to contain Wassenaar's exceptions, but it goes much further than the Wassenaar text. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:10 pm
In 2013, just 8 countries had more than 1% share of all bad bot activity. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
” 1 Page 586 [162 Misc.2d 24] A warrant was issued for respondent’s arrest. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:26 pm
Paul's "filibuster" and what does it mean for the surveillance debate? [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:16 am
Beginning in 1994, this policy listed as beneficiary "Linda Martinez, 41, ex-wife, in accordance with divorce decree dated 09-15-94. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Other courts and commentators reject the notion physicians’ disclosure duties extend to revealing a medical product’s regulatory status.Id. at 940-41 (footnotes omitted). [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am
"(Correction Law § 753 [1].)and that "[a] failure to take into consideration each of these factors results in a failure to comply with the Correction Law's mandatory directive. [read post]
