Search for: "THU L" Results 2381 - 2400 of 12,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2022, 2:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The ’219 patent includes 62 generalized composition embodiments, ’219 patent, col. 6 l. 58– col. 12 l. 40, and eight specific example formulations, id. at col. 12 l. 42–col. 15 l. 33. [read post]
23 May 2008, 9:20 am
The resolutions--mostly sponsored by the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners--have averaged 30.8 percent support at five meetings thus far, compared with 29.8 over 38 meetings during the 2007 proxy season. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:08 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Carlone prevailed against L&B Films in her claim for breach of contract. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:50 am by Shane McCall
OHA noted: “The definition of [SDVOSB] unconditional ownership was thus taken from SBA’s 8(a) BD program. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” “Finally, L’Abbate has submitted unrebutted evidence that it did not charge legal fees for any work associated with the Sanctions Motion, the Clawback Motion, or the Withdrawal Motion, and thus neither Marcum nor its insurers incurred these costs (NYSCEF 60 [Rice Affidavit, ¶7, ¶9, ¶13]). [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
I this context the skilled person understands that the air bellows (“coussins de suspension”) or the actuators (“actionneurs”) can indeed be de-aerated via this conduit (“conduit destine à l’alimentation”), the latter being passive, which means that there is no need for the CAPA to supply pneumatic energy during the de-aeration phase. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am by Lawrence Cunningham
L awyers keep telling clients that arbitation is a matter of contract, not coercion. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
 09-0197-cv(L), 09-4509-cv(XAP), 2ndCir: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a case of first impression, AFFIRMED the district court's grant of summary judgment of an HR director's Title VII retaliation claim because the internal sexual harassment investigation she conducted was unconnected to an EEOC charge or proceeding and, thus, was not protected activity under Title VII's participation clause. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:29 pm
 09-0197-cv(L), 09-4509-cv(XAP), 2ndCir: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a case of first impression, AFFIRMED the district court's grant of summary judgment of an HR director's Title VII retaliation claim because the internal sexual harassment investigation she conducted was unconnected to an EEOC charge or proceeding and, thus, was not protected activity under Title VII's participation clause. [read post]