Search for: "Does 1-100 " Results 2401 - 2420 of 12,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 3:07 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 of the [new main] request read:1. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you stick with the common law, universities are 100% covered. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:44 pm
"[1] What has been less reported, as detailed by Igor Khripunov and William C. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If that same person becomes $1 billion richer by owning shares that have gone up in value, she currently does not have pay taxes on that income, but she should be required to do so. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If that same person becomes $1 billion richer by owning shares that have gone up in value, she currently does not have pay taxes on that income, but she should be required to do so. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(the underlined parts correspond to amendments with respect to claim 1 as maintained by the OD)The Board dealt in detail with the question of whether the invention was sufficiently disclosed (A 100(b) and A 83):*** Translation of the French original ***[3] According to claim 1 of all the requests, the claimed process results in “very high mechanical properties” […]. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:48 pm by Bill Marler
First, the incubation period (time between ingestion and first symptoms) can be 1 to 10 days, but most likely 3 to 4 days. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
For example, in 2019, Lil Nas X’s song “Old Town Road” first went viral on TikTok and now holds as the longest-reigning Billboard Hot 100 No. 1 in the chart’s history. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Does that really mean -- as the Court of Appeal holds -- that Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
SB 6 was the companion bill to AB 2011, but it does not create a ministerial approval process. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 9:52 am
It does point out that the same can’t be said for goods going the other way… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:21 am by David Cosgrove
 What exactly does this section seek to accomplish and how does it go about meeting those goals? [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:50 am by Jeff Gittins
Tim HawkesHouse Bill 84, which was recommended by the Executive Water Rights Task Force, clarifies that: (1) an approved nonuse application excuses the requirement of beneficial use from the nonuse application's filing date; (2) the filing or approval of a nonuse application, or a series of nonuse applications, does not constitute beneficial use or protect a water right that is already subject to forfeiture; and (3) a nonuse application does not bar a water right… [read post]