Search for: "SUITS v. STATE" Results 2401 - 2420 of 32,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The suit also alleged violations of other state constitutional and statutory provisions. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:35 am by Nassiri Law
California is an at-will employment state, which means employees can be fired for any reason and with no warning. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  As the court explained in a prior case, “the Eleventh Amendment applies to suits ‘against’ a state, not suits by a state. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]