Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 2401 - 2420 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 6:35 am by Broc Romanek
The question squarely put by plaintiffs was "how little can a board do and still comply with its duties to get the best price under Revlon when it is attempting to sell the company. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Steve Hall
Price's notes could have suggested that Toledano, not Richardson, was the mastermind.To bolster his argument, Ford reminded Herod about Parrish's misconduct in another case, which prompted the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2008 to overturn the conviction of Death Row inmate Michael Toney, who had been convicted for a 1995 bombing that killed three people. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:45 pm by Kevin
Of course, it all depends on the circumstances, which is why I also agree with the result in People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:31 pm
  The draft line on the bottom of the page says it's "v.2," suggesting that the execution copy was the third and final run. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm by Utah Employment Law Letter
In addition, some courts have recognized gender identity discrimination under a “sex-stereotyping” theory derived from Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Kenya’s anti-counterfeit legislation, India protest (Afro-IP) Cepham – US: CAFC: Another ‘bright-line’ rule from the Federal Circuit; double jeopardy – later developments can overcome double patenting: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas)   General… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Too often, people who invoke professionalism use it to stop analysis rather than further it. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Nathaniel Grow
Specifically, in the 2004 case of Metropolitan Intercollegiate Basketball Ass'n v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:45 am
The purpose of this forced purchase, coupled with the arbitrary price ratios and controls, is to require many people to buy artificially high-priced policies to subsidize the coverage for others. [read post]