Search for: "Doe v. City of New York" Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
We therefore conclude that defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
New York Times, 08-483). ** Whether a  January 2007 decision, Cunningham v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
As H.M. is represented by pro bono counsel from the prominent New York City firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, it is likely that permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals will be sought. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm by Jeff Nowak
Just a few weeks ago, Luke and I made our way from Chicago to the east coast to catch major league baseball games at six different stadiums – Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Boston, New York (Mets and Yankees). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04234, Appellate Division, First Department Supreme Court, New York County denied the CPLR Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award which found that the New York City Department of Education had just cause to terminate the employee, Olga Batyreva. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Among the rulings by New York courts on the issue of "directing an employee to submit to surgery" are the following:In Schenectady PBA v PERB, 196 A.D.2d 171, the Appellate Divisions said that General Municipal Law "§207-c evinces a legislative intent to balance a police officer's right to receive full salary and certain benefits while disabled due to an injury incurred in the line of duty, with certain rights of the employer, including the right… [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm by Ilya Somin
[Recent articles in the Texas Monthy and the New York Times provide some useful insight on why Texas has been gaining migrants at such a high rate.] [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, proper venue for the instant claim may be Family Court, rather than the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Here, by contrast, New York courts are neither over-enforcing nor under-enforcing federal immigration law. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Brill v City of New York, the Court of Appeals held that CPLR 3212(a) permitted a late summary judgment motion upon the showing of good cause, which requires a satisfactory explanation for the untimeliness rather than simply permitting meritorious, nonprejudicial filings, however tardy. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Employee’s claim that her position was eliminated and she was terminated because of her political affiliation rejected by the Appellate Division Wehlage v Quinlan, 55 AD3d 1344 Mary Ann Wehlage sued the City of Olean contending that it had eliminated her position as animal control officer then terminated her employment because of her political affiliation in violation of her 42 USC §1983, the Civil Rights Act and §201(d) of New York… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
A New York Probate Lawyer said the plaintiff, an undocumented alien from Ecuador, immigrated to the United States in 2000, and was hired as a construction worker by the third-party defendant, City Wide Building Corp. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:03 am
Bloomberg , No. 09-0331 In an action challenging amendments to New York term limits legislation, district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs do not have a viable First Amendment claim as any chilling of plaintiffs' First Amendment activity is self-imposed and thus incidental and constitutionally insignificant; 2) the challenged law does not violate plaintiffs' substantive due process rights guaranteed by the… [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Peterson v Corbin and Nalitt v City of New York that a preliminary criminal injunctive relief is a drastic remedy which will not be granted unless a clear right thereto is established under the law and the undisputed facts upon the moving papers, and the burden of showing an undisputed right rests upon the movant. [read post]