Search for: "Richard M. Re" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
It’s still terra incognita in parts–can’t walk New York City in a week, after all– but I’m finding megatons of information that are starting to make me think I’m not just crazy from the law-school grind and maybe, just maybe, I too can hit a ‘solo (practice)’ home run. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Over the past couple of decades, we’ve witnessed enormous progress on LGBTQ+ issues. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm by David Kopel
The Court unanimously re-affirmed Beard‘s no-retreat rule in Alberty v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Prods. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
In the news Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry granted clemency to Richard Tandy Smith. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am by Mandelman
  I’m sorry, you’ll have to ask my staff about that, I’m due at a dinner party being hosted by the American Bankers Association and they’re serving poached bald eagle eggs atop baby seal stuffed with currency and bearer bonds. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
He wrote the following as quoted by retired judge Richard Posner:The fairest and most rational method to interpret the will of the legislator, is by exploring his intentions at the time when the law made, by signs the most natural and probable. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 9:09 pm
A very hot topic this week was Washington Supreme Court Justice Richard Sanders standing up at a Federalist Society dinner with Attorney General Michael Mukasey bellowing out, "Tyrant! [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The intention of the Board is not to re-regulate the rail industry with burdensome new rules. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I’m also grateful to Jeff Abramson for his really valiant role as moderator, given the necessarily limited time available and the necessity to truncate remarks. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Jeff Gamso
 (It was a lot more complicated than that, which your really couldn't tell from the court's opinion which is why I'm not bothering to link to it.) [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:10 am by itars sis
When Donat-Pourrières denied that the Parmigianino was a forgery and refused to return the money, Sotheby’s also sued Donat-Pourrières in 2017. [read post]