Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 2441 - 2460 of 10,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lea Shaver, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
An outbreak of Germany's magnitude, however, isn't exactly a common occurrence. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And this is isn’t the platform — it’s an employment law blog, folks — from which to preach about such societal matters anyway. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:51 pm by Buce
One possible solution would have been to abstain--to say "I don't know whether I have jurisdiction or not but this a matter best settled in courts of Texas, so go fight it out there. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:18 pm by Joe Palazzolo
The agency and Citi said they would have to allocate lots of resources to litigate the matter, but Rakoff said that wasn’t the sort of harm on which to peg an appeal. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
That rule wasn’t “study the law,” or “make sure everything we say has a sound legal basis. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm also not sure why it should matter that "[t]he public figure doctrine emerged in an era prior to the Internet advertising model that rewards news organizations for the ongoing display of defamatory content. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:26 am by SHG
As a practical matter, this means, as Roberts wrote, that “when a challenged regulation does not precisely match its historical precursors, ‘it still may be analogous enough to pass constitutional muster. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:34 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Chief Justice Roberts recognized this, writing that “[i]t is implausible that Congress meant the Act to operate in this manner. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm by Rick Hills
I can already hear the protests of my centralizing friends who love "rights absolutism," declaring that these are matters of federal right that must be defined by federal judges. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm by Barry Barnett
He also has, in the realm of humor, what the French call "I don't know what". [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by eileen peck
Don’t rely on an inexperienced attorney, don’t assume the courts will treat you favorably and don’t attempt to represent yourself. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 10:59 pm
 But pure ideological disagreement shouldn't be a reason to vote against the nominee.There's a way for Obama to make a grand gesture -- he could publicly say that his votes against Roberts and Alito (especially the former) were mistakes. [read post]