Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
BYLT Performance LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The court said that the evidence showed that questions that could lead to an applicant’s “automatic” disqualification concerned the applicant’s “legal documentation to work in the United States,” his or her willingness to undergo a criminal background check and employment reference check, his or her willingness to submit to a drug test, whether the applicant states the he or she is able to perform the essential functions of the job, and… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The court said that the evidence showed that questions that could lead to an applicant’s “automatic” disqualification concerned the applicant’s “legal documentation to work in the United States,” his or her willingness to undergo a criminal background check and employment reference check, his or her willingness to submit to a drug test, whether the applicant states the he or she is able to perform the essential functions of the job, and… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
In 1993, Horphag was granted the United States trademark for the mark Pycnogenol. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:59 am
As demonstrated by the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Farhner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
EAI operates a franchise network of over 1,200 independent owner-operated franchise locations throughout the United States and internationally. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Next, the Board applied the four-part test articulated in University of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge Baer) held that these claims were precluded under Morrison because the plaintiffs’ transactions were the functional equivalent of transactions in VW stock, which was not traded in the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1,17–18 (1966); United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
In American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit narrowed the order of U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:11 pm
One Wholesaler v. [read post]
