Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 2461 - 2480 of 40,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Brian Shiffrin
At its inception, the encounter [*2]was a request for information, and defendant does not dispute that "[t]he police had an objective, credible reason for approaching [his] car . . . inasmuch as the car was illegally parked" (People v Valerio, 274 AD2d 950, 951, affd 95 NY2d 924, cert denied 532 US 981). [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court found that “[t]he gravamen of Count VIII is that Defendant John Doe I breached the fiduciary duty owed to Plaintiff by representing two parties with conflict- ing interests and by sacrificing the interests of one party for another. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:59 pm by Donald Clarke
I've finally gone through the transcripts from day 2 of the Bo Xilai trial. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 11:42 am by Joel A. Webber
” TIKD’s lawyer argued to the Florida Supreme Court that TIKD, as a commercial service that hired lawyers on behalf of its customers, did nothing more than a liability insurer does when it hires a lawyer for a policy holder who’s the defendant in a lawsuit covered by its policy, or when that insurer pays out on a court judgment against the policy holder. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
Defendants engaged in government-supervised cleanup operations that were completed in October 2006, _id._, at 2-3, Plaintiffs owned “residential waterfront property on the bay,” _id._, at 2. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 6:01 am by Michael J. Glennon
Nor does the treaty expand the president’s war power. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Patton, No. 112488 -- (1) Does Section 2-56-040 of the Chicago Municipal Code authorize the Inspector General of the City of Chicago to hire private counsel to enforce subpoenas? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
John Does, Defendant [sic], 2015 WL 930249 (U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:17 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
  On the flip side, however, a Defendant should also be sure to understand that a Final Restraining Order does not necessarily mean a permanent restraint, as there is statutory authority that allows for Final Restraining Orders to be dissolved or modified. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 7:51 am by Jon Sands
  Alas, for defendant, he escapes the categorical aggravated felony enhancement, but falls prey to the modified analysis, because his plea references to count 2 of the complaint, as does the minute entry. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
In his judgment, Daniel Alexander QC added: ‘... overall, the sum I am awarding provides a reasonable sum by way of costs to the Claimant (it is about 50% of its total costs ignoring photocopying) but it does not unjustly penalize the Defendant by awarding full costs against it, having regard to their offer’. [read post]
30 May 2024, 3:58 pm by KJK
Documenting damages will help you streamline your case and advocate for yourself and your business in court. 2.) [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:24 pm by The Grife Law Firm, P.A.
Armand-Hosang, the Fourth District Court of Appeal clarified its perspective on two points: 1) what is considered sufficient evidence to prove past medical expenses and 2) how to deal with admission of expert testimony that does not conform to the court’s trial order. [read post]