Search for: "STATE v B J J J" Results 2461 - 2480 of 6,788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
He criticised Motors’ proof of use evidence, meaning its likelihood of confusion (5(2)(b)) case failed. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm by Giles Peaker
A similar argument was rejected by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, ex p. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:18 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
-No debería hacerse responsables a los estudiantes por los señalamientos que ha realizado la Middle States, pues los más apremiantes se relacionan con la gobernanza y no con el paro decretado. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Dismissing a human rights complaint for "administrative convenience" and "dismissal of a human rights complaint on the merit" distinguishedVetro v Hampton Bays Union Free School Dist., 2017 NY Slip Op 01910, Appellate Division, Second Department In an action seeking to recover damages for his alleged wrongful termination of employment by the Hampton Bays Union Free School District, Frank J. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
In the coordinated California state court talc cases, Judge Maren E. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
At para. 49, Rothstein J unequivocally stated that “there is only one standard of proof and that is proof on a balance of probabilities. [read post]