Search for: "Berkeley v. Berkeley"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 2,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
Sommer, 15 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
Oracle to appeals court: Google concedes away the entire case under established copyright principles
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
This academic is Berkeley Professor Pamela Samuelson, the aforementioned EFF Vice Chairwoman. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Federalization is therefore, in Sandeen's words, an unobtainable myth.Whether we agree with Ann or Sharon regarding federal judges' actual (or perceived) common-law-making authority in IP law, Sharon's project––which stems from her forthcoming article in Berkeley Technology Law Journal on federalization of trade secrecy law (co-authored with Chris Seaman)––suggest that the IP field does not actually have a coherent… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Before the New York court unsealed the indictment against former President Donald J. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
To make that point, Eastman has relied on testimony from Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo.That might seem an odd choice, given that Professor Yoo isn't himself all that mainstream. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
If her FTC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
Kenneth Vercammen's Law office represents individuals charged with criminal and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
The case in McBrayer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Bollinger and Gratz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
(Some related lessons may need reinforcement given the recent incident at UC Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky’s home, an episode on which I might offer a few thoughts in a later column.)The first big question surrounding the Maryland incident that needs exploration relates to whether “shouting down” a speaker is itself expression protected under the First Amendment because it (shouting down) takes the form of speech (albeit loud speech.)For present purposes, I shall… [read post]
