Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 2481 - 2500 of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The City subsequently sued Whalen seeking [1] to recover all compensation it had paid to him during the period of the theft and [2] a judicial declaration that it is under no obligation to furnish him with health insurance earned through his employment. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:01 pm
The SAS software had been in use for some 35 years, generating income of more than £2 billion. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:57 am by Jon Hyman
Above the Law, quoting the Huffington Post, provides the details: Waltherr-Willard, 61, claims in her lawsuit against the Mariemont school district that for 35 years, she taught Spanish and French to high school students in the system. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by David DePaolo
Guillot-Guyard’s children, now 7 and 10 years old, a total of $1 million.Certainly, though, for Cirque, workers' compensation is a bargain. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The United States, however, has enacted a provision that deals with inventions in space, specifically 35 USC 105. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
As such, the TBA concluded that it had to apply Broccoli/Tomatoes II (G2/12 and G2/13) unless it had reasons to refer the decision for reconsideration by the EBA.The TBA further noted that whilst the AC has the power to amend the Articles of the EPC under Article 33(1)(b) EPC, the AC is not competent to amend the EPC by means of amendment of the implementing regulations (r. 33-35). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:17 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The examiner rejected the applications for lacking distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 7:19 am
Jets won't win, but 35-21 sounds about right to us. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm by JB
  It's no different in principle from enforcing the 35-year age requirement. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:59 am
"In consequence thereof, Applicant has failed to submit sufficient evidence of actual use of the applied-for mark in commerce as required under Sections 1 and 45 of the Trademark. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Because Travel Sentry and its licensees areno longer “prevailing parties” to whom an award of attorneyfees could be made under 35 U.S.C. [read post]