Search for: "State v. T. L. D." Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Kitzhaber, MD, Governor of the State of Oregon, hereby grant Gary D. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Douglas Laycock, Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause, 81 Notre Dame L. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
L. 93–595, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1937; Apr. 17, 2000 (eff. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Plaintiffs aren’t barred from licensing their publicity rights in any other state that recognizes the right of publicity, and the NCAA didn’t show that every other state has the same limits. [read post]