Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 3,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
YES = 80.6% NO = 19.4% Respondents = 103 3. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
Council, 462 U.S. 87, 105, 103 S.Ct. 2246, 76 L.Ed.2d 437 (1983)). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Is it possible to devise such a mechanism which never does? [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:17 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 223, 103 S. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Pointing to Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1/07, page 73, it explains that the mere fact that a method - such as an imaging method - may be used advantageously during surgery does not make it a surgical method (the IPKat's take on G1/07 can be found here). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
While I am not typically a fan of merging considerations under the patent statute, and have been highly critical of the many judges, particularly Supreme Court Justices that unknowingly weave together the very different considerations presented by the novelty inquiry (35 U.S.C. 102) and obviousness (35 U.S.C. 103), there is no such concern with leveraging patentable subject matter alongside of written description. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
In re Seaborg, 328 F.2d 996 (CCPA 1964) (upholding patent for element 95, americium, which does not occur in nature). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm
LawMed.Com http://www.lawmed.com/nursinghome/ There are some inspiring articles about patients living to be 103 as well as some truly frightening stories on this blog. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:55 am
Proposed Exemptions The International IFM Exemption An International IFM would not need to register as an investment fund manager if all the following conditions are met: The securities of the investment fund it manages are distributed only to “permitted clients” (as defined in NI 31-103, and which generally means institutional and high net worth individual investors); It does not have a physical place of business in Canada; … [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Thirteen times in the past six years, the Justice Department has opted not to defend a statute.Baker & McKenzie Hit With $103 Million Malpractice Verdict The American LawyA Mississippi jury has found in favor of a former Baker & McKenzie client by returning a $103 million malpractice verdict against the firm and a lawyer in its Dallas office. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:35 am
Stat. 6-8-103 (2007). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
In fact, it would be extremely rare (if not completely impossible) for there to be an invention that does not have any relevant prior art. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
§ 103, but were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
Applicable law 103. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:50 pm
Philadelphia Transportation Co., 376 Pa. 497, 103 A.2d 681, 684 (1954). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:26 am
Schwemberger does not dispute this finding. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Even then, the CUA does not require that a person be registered in order to reap its benefits.) [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
So , what does it mean ? [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 am
Supp. 2d 88, 103 n. 12 (D. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm
Childs et al. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue 103 T.C. [read post]
