Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 2501 - 2520 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 6:16 am by Gregory Forman
The family court refused to continue Wifes motion for temporary relief to first address Husbands jurisdictional claim. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
This could apply even to supposedly meddling in-laws, but practically usually applied to men who supposedly seduced a wife away from her husband. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm by Erin DeGeorge
 The husband represented himself and the wife had a pro bono lawyer. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
However, it was error to compute postjudgment interest on the wifes share of the husbands interest in his law firm at a rate of 5% per annum. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:30 am by Aaron Weems
In the Fox case, the wife obtained a temporary Protection From Abuse evicting the husband from the marital residence, as well as prohibiting any communication between the two of them. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
” But the mere fact that his wife exposed her statements to her husband, aware that he was carrying an “interception-capable device—i.e., an iPhone”—did not displace her expectation of privacy (Huff v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:11 am by CzepigaDalyPope LLC
For example, if a husband dies and leaves a trust behind for his wife that states, as did the trust in the  Palomba-Bourke case, that the trustee can use the trust for the wifes care, maintenance and support, then if the wife enters a nursing home or if her new husband enters a nursing home, the assets in the trust are treated no differently than if the assets were in the wifes pocket—the trust funds are… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Husbands Violation of the Automatic Orders In 2020, Wife filed for divorce. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:27 am by Mark Goldstein, Esq.
The Agreement, as Claimed by the Wife In the Nassau County Supreme Court case of Liberman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:16 pm
The husband's will appointed his wife as the personal representative of his estate, which would have meant that the wife was charged with representing the husband's interest against herself in the divorce proceeding. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:42 pm
In this case, the appellate court found two factors persuasive. (1) The trial court did not state its ruling was “due to the wifes failure to make a prima facie showing of the husbands fraud, as a matter of law. [read post]