Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
Bérard protested, perhaps too much, when asked about her having ignored p-values: “I’m not the only one saying that. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
at p. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Michael P. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:10 pm
Some others presumably were cases in which he was representing one of the parties, but it's hard to know how many in which he was directly involved.In addition to notes about the type of case (usually 'default,' though sometimes 'appeal'), some matters have an "X" notation; others have a "B" or "P". [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
But, if we have a race-conscious goal that is permissible or even compelling, such as integration or equal opportunity, it still matters what means we use to achieve it. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
P. 48(b)) of eight to two in favor of Ventura on defamation and unjust enrichment and in favor of Kyle on appropriation. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:01 am
Elliot-Meisel, Understanding the Canada-United States Arctic Relationship P. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:14 am
Donohoe, 388 P.2d 399 (Colo. 1964). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Minton in analyzing themalpractice case of Neurorepair against THE NATH LAW GROUP AND ROBERT P. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
The second is Mr Justice Arnold, whose detailed and inevitably lengthy pronouncements on matters of IP law have truly earned the adjective 'Arnoldian' a permanent place in our working vocabulary. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
“[W]e have never before held—in the context of either § 271(f) or § 271(b)—that a party can induce itself to infringe. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
This definition is no longer used and Model Rule 3.4-18 is now triggered when either (emphasis added): (a) It is reasonable to believe the transferring lawyer has confidential information relevant to the new law firm’s matter for its client; or (b) the new law firm represents a client in a matter that is the same as or related to a matter in which the a former law firm represents or represented its client (“former client”); (ii) the interests of… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
The attorneys at James P. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
* Swedes consider the "penal value" of a trade mark infringementProsecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) is a trade mark infringement ruling where the Swedish Supreme Court addresses criminal consequences of IP infringement. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
That matters, and it matters a great deal. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am
It’s always the totality of facts that matters. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
The attorneys at James P. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
The court viewed this attempt as “an end-run around 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
