Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 2521 - 2540 of 8,628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
  The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday a unanimous court ruled in Thacker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Emma Muncey
Therefore, as he was entitled to do so on the basis of the evidence before him (as per Hollington v Hewthorn [1943] and reaffirmed in Rogers v Hoyle [2014]), in finding the patents obvious in the current proceedings, Nugee J came to a different conclusion to Birss J on the invalidating piece of prior art concerning oxygen masks. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Peter Selvin Ben Clements In the following guest post, Peter Selvin and Ben Clements take a look at the legal principles involved in the allocation of defense expense under a D&O insurance policy. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Verret (George Mason University), on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Surveys MFW Compliance in Controller-led transaction Olenik v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Super Lawyers named Chicago business litigation attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer and Illinois breach of contract and employment termination attorney Patrick Austermuehle a Rising Star in the Categories of Chicago Business Litigation, and Class Action Litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:56 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
[2] A.B. v Singer Shoes [3] These terms are used for explanatory purposes only. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:56 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
[2] A.B. v Singer Shoes [3] These terms are used for explanatory purposes only. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court in this case goes on to hold that the plaintiff cannot meet that burden, and the case is dismissed for good.The case is Natofsky v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:37 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
You can read the full decision here.Super Lawyers named Chicago business dispute trial attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer and Chicago business dispute lawyer Patrick Austermuehle a Rising Star in the Category of Business Litigation, and Class Action. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm by Matt Pavich
In an unpublished opinion, the appellate court affirmed a district court’s finding that the franchisor had a likelihood of success at trial and would be irreparably harmed absent a preliminary injunction barring the franchisee from setting up a competing ice cream parlor (Handel’s Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Boards of Directors, Delaware law, DGCL, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Safe harbor, State law Lorenzo v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Peter Reap
Peter ReapIn a patent infringement suit brought by Omega Patents against CalAmp Corp. alleging infringement of Omega’s U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]