Search for: "York v York" Results 2521 - 2540 of 52,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Van Ravenstein v Ponder 2023 NY Slip Op 33072(U) September 6, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161420/2019 is an interesting opinion from Judge Shlomo S. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Thomas Frampton, University of Virginia School of Law, has posted The First Black Jurors and the Integration of the American Jury, which is forthcoming in the New York University Law Review:Supreme Court opinions involving race and the jury invariably open with the Fourteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, or landmark cases like Strauder v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 8:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The government says Google’s goal was to stomp out competition…” See also The New York Times – Who’s Who in the Google Monopoly Trial. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am by Robert Fuller
The waiver at issue, which is included in the record on appeal (Docket 22-1744, Doc. 29-2, page 232 of 235), provides for exclusive jurisdiction in New York, application of New York substantive law and states that “[a]ny disputes . . . will be handled individually without any class action. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Five Towns Pediatrics, P.C. v Billet, Feit & Preis, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 32328(U) July 12, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157252/2018Judge: Andrea Masley we see that plaintiff had a rocky course with its accountants. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court also provides interesting analysis on what constitutes an adverse action under Title VII.The case is Banks v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
One can also find New York case law for the proposition that directors of New York corporations owe fiduciary duties to both the corporation and its shareholders.) [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Here's a NYT article from last May: "New York City Asks for Relief From Its Right-to-Shelter Mandate/City officials say that the arrival of 65,000 asylum seekers has presented the city 'with challenges never contemplated, foreseeable or indeed even remotely imagined.'"The mandate comes from a consent decree in the 1981 case Callahan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]