Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 4,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
99% Infringing… http://t.co/24vLFPEtJu -> Washington State Passes Social Networking Privacy Legislation http://t.co/oLRiRIuaFc -> Making social networks remediate defamation enabled by their platforms: McKeogh v Facebook: A recent Irish cas… http://t.co/YYPAjpImvI -> Google's Eric Schmidt Says Hollywood's 'Storytelling Wins' in 'The New Digital Age' http://t.co/6puWKdM9R2 -> Keen On … Antitrust: Why Startup Entrepreneurs Should Fear Google… [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:43 am
In Hamstein Cumberland Music Group v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:43 am
In Hamstein Cumberland Music Group v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:47 pm
All five of those country music luminaries hail from Oklahoma. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:25 pm
I can’t write a better introductory sentence than Judge Andrew Carter of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York did to open his May 20, 2013, order and opinion in Blagman v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
University Of Georgia Music Business Program’s Preliminary Study Of Advertising On Copyrigh http://t.co/vMZaCaHxGx -> Federal Circuit Nightmare in CLS Bank v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am
Next month I have oral argument in Ochre LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:25 am
Witness Jule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel for Copyright Microsoft Corporation, noted the decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:30 am
Now Paints Apple as ‘Ringmaster’ in Its Lawsuit on E-Book Price-Fixing http://t.co/fZGUryaJTg -> Google signs music service deals with Sony, Universal: report http://t.co/wzMbvmy0Vd -> Patent Troll Panel at Yale Law School http://t.co/zRfO4fZn16 -> The Alice in Wonderland En Banc Decision by the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:45 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994). [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/UY7DquwRV2 -> Recap of Washington State’s Employer Social Media Password Bill http://t.co/eeHWKyhy4n -> Has the UK abolished copyright? [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:16 pm
Usually, such a proclamation by plaintiffs is music to the defendants’ ears. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
There were a handful of resolved cases reported: Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
Ten ways in which copyright engages freedom of expression, Part 2: Sliders six to ten – Graham Smith
3 May 2013, 5:05 pm
Sir Tim Berners Lee said in the early days of the Web: “The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States … addresses the right to speak. [read post]
