Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 16,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
He wasn't quite ready to meet a progressive with a long history of being against strong judicial review. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm
In a particularly troubling portion of the opinion, Justice Alito claims that “one strong and entirely legitimate state interest is the prevention of fraud. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 7:53 pm
That said, Mah Kiat Seng may not be the last word on the status of public interest immunity in Singapore law, given the previous conflicting decision in BSD v Attorney-General [2019] SGHC 118. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 5:33 pm
The case, Patino v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
To be a publisher is no longer a position borne of power and privilege, and the lines of defence against inaccuracy that the New York Times v Sullivan precedent relied upon are not as strong as they once were. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 11:22 am
The case is entitled Ivanovs et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
This is not to suggest that the State Council, as the delegated institutional organ charged by the vanguard with the task of relating the task of overcoming the current principal contradiction in its "human rights" aspects, were not looking over their shoulder at how the rest of the world would read and interpret the document. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
But even if statistics showing a strong attendance rate are accurate, a sizable number of immigrants still do not appear at removal proceedings, especially as the number of pending immigration cases nears 1.4 million. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Indeck Energy Services v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
One state, though, is not nine—and Delaware did not turn the proposal into law.The ninth state did, however. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:05 am
From today's Eighth Circuit decision in Nunes v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am
In layman’s terms, not as strong as the iPhone mark but still a protectable mark and, of course, it is registered. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
United States (in which the office supported sentencing reductions for certain crack-cocaine offenders). [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
As the particulars of claim make clear: ‘the claimants were deeply shocked and extremely distressed at the public revelation of these tragic and highly sensitive family matters which have been kept private (or ‘secret’ as the Defendant itself states in the article) for over 30 years. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:41 am
Yesterday's Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
Moreover, there is a strong federalism angle. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am
C2R instead argued that its ads conveyed that its products render approximately the stated number of pills “safe for disposal” (not fully deactivated) using a variety of mechanisms, activated carbon adsorption being one. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:12 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
