Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 2561 - 2580 of 8,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 6:20 am by Shaun Marker
The Second District Court of Appeal stated that the insured cooperated in the appraisal process from May 2008 until December 2008 and noted that he did not end the appraisal process; he just wanted a new umpire. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:26 pm by Sean Hanover
The habeas corpus filing Governing regulations are Zadvydas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:38 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
DFW cooperated with PA and WV and West Virginia University on a habitat use study in the urban-wild land interface. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Servs. of Nassau County, 2015 NY Slip Op 09284, Appellate Division, Second Department The Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County [BOCES] filed disciplinary charges against one of its employees, Lucky Idolor. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:11 pm by Margaret Flynt
Cooper rejected a plea bargain after his attorney (wrongly) informed him that the state could not prove intent to murder since the shots were fired below the waist. [read post]
21 May 2007, 6:25 am
According to the Appellate Term, First Department, in Brontman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
He expressed doubt about the government's argument that trying the case would jeopardize state secrets, but said he would wait to decide the case until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on Hepting v. [read post]