Search for: "State v. David."
Results 2561 - 2580
of 14,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 12:25 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 3:28 am
Alok Srivastava v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 pm
Congress Needs to be Way, Way Bigger By David Litt, Author, Democracy in One Book or Less David Litt argues that, to adequately represent the needs of the people, the House of Representatives should increase its size. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:00 am
GLENN HEGAR, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; AND KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, No. 18-0503 Opinion of the Court IN THE INTEREST OF D.S., A CHILD, No. 18-0908 Opinion of the Court Concurring THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AND DAVID COOKE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS FORT WORTH CITY MANAGER… [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am
Repeal § 511 is cited in the following article: David Kim, XIII. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:47 am
Walker's opinion in Friday's decision in NRA v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Rather, the test for dishonesty should be: What was the defendant’s actual state of knowledge or belief as to the facts? [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Part II discusses state variations on the scope of the standard ethnic categories, in particular in the states' Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) programs. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
The Guardian had a post “YouTube deletes conspiracy theorist David Icke’s channel”. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
