Search for: "*state of al v. Corps of Engineers"
Results 241 - 260
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 6:47 pm
” Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:00 am
The name of this case is Sher v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
” And in Yale Electric Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., Case 10-1062 (Sackett). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
In Olympus Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
In Olympus Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Ace Hardware Corp. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:47 am
‡Da Silva Moore, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm
Corp.,432 F.3d 1368, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
”); Molon Motor and Coil Corp. v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al v John T… [read post]
