Search for: "Apotex"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Apotex Inc., No. 15-307 Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Apotex Inc., No. 15-307 Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:43 pm
Apotex, Inc., 633 F.3d 1042, 1050 (Fed. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 11:54 am
Apotex, Inc., 633 F.3d 1042, 1048 (Fed. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
" Apotex, Inc., et al v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 6:39 am
Supreme Court rejects cellphone search warrant case" and "U.S. top court allows Apotex to pursue generic version of Daiichi drug. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Apotex Inc., 2003 FCT 687, the Court held that a divisional patent that expired on the same day as the parent was invalid for double patenting on the basis that a second patent can cause additional injunctions under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations and more generally that “that inventive ingenuity was still needed to support the second patent. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:20 pm
• Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Apotex Inc. 15-307Issue: (1) Whether Article III’s case or controversy requirement can be satisfied when the suit seeks a judgment of non-infringement of a disclaimed patent; and (2) whether Congress can create Article III jurisdiction by imposing statutory consequences that turn on obtaining a judgment of non-infringement of a disclaimed patent. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am
Apotex,” that “involves a curiousness in the way generic drugs are regulated. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
Apotex and Daiichi Sankyo v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Apotex Inc. 15-307 Issue: (1) Whether Article III’s case or controversy requirement can be satisfied when the suit seeks a judgment of non-infringement of a disclaimed patent; and (2) whether Congress can create Article III jurisdiction by imposing statutory consequences that turn on obtaining a judgment of non-infringement of a disclaimed patent. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:41 am
Apotex: Whether an action seeking a declaration judgment of non-infringement presents a justiciable case or controversy under Article III of the Constitution where the patent at issue was previously disclaimed and thus cannot be enforced. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: The Adoption by International Tribunals of a Substantive/Transactional Approach to Res Judicata—A New Paradigm in International Dispute Resolution? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm
Apotex, Inc., No. 06-cv-5571, 2010 U.S.Dist. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Apotex, Inc., [1990] 1 F.C. 221 (F.C.A.), the Court held that evidence on irreparable harm must be “clear and not speculative”. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Apotex Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company et al., 2015 ONSC 5396 http://t.co/j3ip6Bu515 -> Damage lawsuits could be latest antitrust challenge for Google in Europe http://t.co/HP0uNXDYAz -> Uber Rebuffed by Judge in Ruling on Drivers’ Suit http://t.co/S2Bx28hG4Q -> Google Antitrust Investigations Spread Across the Globe – http://t.co/11G7Amkjnd http://t.co/7JQxUIXNP9 -> Google’s Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers – http://t.co/11G7Amkjnd… [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am
Last week I predicted that the High Court would affirm the finding of five judges of the Federal Court of Australia that AstraZenenca’s patents covering low-dosage forms of the cholesterol-lowering drug marketed as CRESTOR (having the active ingredient rosuvastatin) are invalid on grounds of obviousness.In the much-anticipated decision in AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (et al) [2015] HCA 30, five judges of the High Court, in four distinct concurring opinions, have unanimously… [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Apotex Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company et al., 2015 ONSC 5396 http://t.co/j3ip6Bu515 -> Damage lawsuits could be latest antitrust challenge for Google in Europe http://t.co/HP0uNXDYAz -> Uber Rebuffed by Judge in Ruling on Drivers’ Suit http://t.co/S2Bx28hG4Q -> Google Antitrust Investigations Spread Across the Globe – http://t.co/11G7Amkjnd http://t.co/7JQxUIXNP9 -> Google’s Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers – http://t.co/11G7Amkjnd… [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 10:00 pm
Amgen has filed a complaint under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), asserting that a biosimilar application filed by Apotex, Inc. infringes two of its patents. [read post]
