Search for: "COOPER v. HOLDER" Results 241 - 260 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 3:01 pm by Kerry Sheehan
Copyright holders in that case argued that ISPs, like Cox (Cox was not part of the CAS) should cut off subscribers’ Internet access on the basis of copyright holders’ mere allegations of infringement. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
The information holder would have to address difficult questions of proportionality in disclosing confidential information: the only help was the (limited) Guidance, which set too low a threshold for overriding duties of confidentiality [96-100]; and clear guidance was needed for information holders as to how to assess proportionality when considering whether or not information should be shared [101]. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:18 am by Orin Kerr
Instead, he rejects the application because the target of the search was cooperating with the government and had consented to the search. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
A 1998 trial court decision in A&A Properties NY Ltd. v Soundings Condominium broke new ground by granting the unit holder’s application to inspect the list. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Next up is Lightfoot v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by Charlie Dunlap
But I would have also thought the same of criminalizing the teaching of law as “material support,” but the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Members of the public are deemed to have knowledge of an agency’s administrative action that has been posted on the Internet Eskridge v Nassau County BOCES, Decisions of the Commissioner Education, Decision No. 16,932Meredith Eskridge appealed the decision of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County [BOCES] denial of her request to be placed on the preferred eligibility list for a position as a teacher of deaf and hard of hearing. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Finley, which challenged political content restriction on NEA funding; and Holder v. [read post]