Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 241 - 260
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
To rule otherwise would effectively give collective marks absolute protection, irrespective of the goods covered by the signs at issue [this is why it's better to have protected geographical indication protection in Europe, adds Merpel: try using "Champagne", irrespective of the goods or services you want to use it for, and see how far you get ...].* The goods and services here were dissimilar. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
C’est l’objet de la première partie dont l’approche transversale conduit à dégager les grandes lignes : elle révèle un tronc commun qui traduit l’unité de la matière et permet de mieux en comprendre l’esprit. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
In Carter v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
But, more importantly, the AmeriKat has finally experienced a flatbed experience – thank you, American Airline Advantage miles – and now can fully appreciate what all the fuss is about (or was it the unlimited ice cream sundaes and champagne….?) [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:58 am
This Thursday, 19 April, we have two block-busters:Judgment is being given in Case C-273/05 P Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
In consequence, there may be more canapes and Champagne for the rest of us. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:33 am
United Air Lines (1999) and Williams v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
Back to Hassell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:10 am
Today it was the turn of spirits, with Joined Cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
Rothe Development, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:51 am
Klarman’s assessment of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 8:48 am
(Law on Legislation, Art. 8(v); that's one reason why re-education through labor, with its flimsy statutory basis, has been under attack.) [read post]
