Search for: "EEOC v. May and Co., Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Despite having not filed their own EEOC charges, four African-American Ford employees could advance Title VII claims asserting that they suffered race bias and were retaliated against after their coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and “a class of Black employees,” a federal district court in Illinois ruled, denying Ford’s motion to dismiss (Rogers v Ford Motor Co, July 26, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
The claimants here were employees of UTi Integrated Logistics, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Robin E. Shea
The vicarious liability standard for supervisor harassment was announced in two Supreme Court decisions from 1998: Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Sheppard Mullin
Instead, it was adopted by the Supreme Court as a way to identify those individuals whose actions could give rise to vicarious employer liability in the two earlier decisions of Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Last week, in a non-employment dispute, a divided High Court handed a victory to parties seeking to avoid class arbitration when it ruled, in American Express Co v Italian Colors Restaurant, that courts may not invalidate class arbitration waivers merely because a plaintiff’s cost of arbitrating a dispute individually would exceed the potential recovery. [read post]