Search for: "FRANK BROWN v. THE STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
In 1936, the Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
A complete list of the magisterial district courts, with addresses and contact numbers, as of Jan. 7, 2008, follows: District Justice Information: Effective 01-07-08 Court District Justice Phone Number Address 07-1-01 Brown, Leonard J. 215-638-1040 Fax: 215-638-0135 2404 Byberry RoadBensalem, PA 19020 07-1-02 Peranteau, Sr., Frank W. 215-785-3521 Fax: 215-785-0816 501 Bath Street Bristol, PA 19007 07-1-03 Kline, Joanne… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
"  That decision would remain the law of the land for nearly sixty years until overruled in the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Brown is almost as dull as Sir (Lord) Alec Douglas- Home and Stanley Baldwin. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by royblack
The deep south was not ready to accept public defense for indigent, mainly black defendants, just like it refused to accept Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
Brown, which the Court will hear in early October. [read post]