Search for: "Freed v. Freed"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
The Thirteenth Amendment was insufficient by itself to prevent the newly-freed from being de facto re-enslaved. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm
And in the long-pending case of Ingersoll and Freed v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:24 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Freed and consider whether how to address the Court on the issue of “fundamental fairness. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Documents filed in the Austin federal court earlier this week said the Brenham, TX, resident was freed immediately after processing on May 28 on a $50,000 unsecured bond. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:18 pm
As the Supreme Court of Canada wrote in M.M. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
That law authorized the payment of more than $1 million in 1862 money (more than $24 million in 2017) to D.C. owners of enslaved people for “lost property” when their enslaved people were freed. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
A bicycle equipped with only handbrakes shall be tested for stopping distance by a rider of at least 68.1 kg (150 lb) weight in accordance with the performance test, § 1512.18(d)(2) (v) and (vi), and shall have a stopping distance of no greater than 4.57 m (15 ft) from the actual test speed as determined by the equivalent ground speed specified in § 1512.18(d)(2)(vi).(2) Hand lever access. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:33 pm
See Jansen v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:41 am
If so, it would relieve both parties from their contract, meaning that while the college would be freed from its agreement to provide a quality education, Shaffer would similarly be relieved of his duty to pay for an education that wasn’t received. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am
Chase, the author of the Texas v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Freed and Karl J. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
