Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 241 - 260
of 7,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Second Circuit decision restricting public officials from blocking foes on Twitter is likely to discourage local electeds from sharing on social media, among its other problems [Gabriel Malor thread, John Samples/Cato, earlier] State of Washington defines lawyers’ pro bono work as “campaign expenditure,” even when it goes toward ballot access effort for a measure that never reached the ballot to be campaigned over. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
The City's concern arose from a large volume of Open Public Records Act (OPRA)requests it was receiving for confidential emails between City officials including emails sent and received by Mayor Dawn Zimmer.The City contacted Edward Reiss to conduct an investigation into the suspected data breach. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
Drawing a clear line between immigration and policing advances constitutional rights, public safety, and solidarity. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
One distinction in the arguments supporting reversal of the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is whether being subpoenaed to testify should be a per se exception to Garcetti’s “pursuant to official duties” standard. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
Do officials in the public policy department intervene for such high-profile decisions? [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
We’re rewriting the exemption. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
In a decision styled, Garcia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 am
From Sam Adams to Mark Twain, Americans throughout history have used pseudonyms to criticize public officials. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:25 pm
Indicting a public official is always a cause for attention. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
The issues in this appeal arise from that decision, as well as the judge's later refusal to recuse herself, and her denial of Petitioner's Motion to Vacate his delinquency adjudication. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
The DOE appealed the court’s ruling.The Appellate Division unanimously sustained the Supreme Court’s decision after excepting from disclosure certain additional pages or portions of pages it identified in its decision, explaining that the lower court had “properly directed the disclosure of some portions of these records, notwithstanding OSI's finding the complaint “unsubstantiated. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
They petitioned the Tenth Circuit to review that decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:40 am
Appellate courts sometimes seem to make an extra effort to protect small towns and cities from the effects of unwise or unpopular decisions, if the governing body acted in good faith for what the officials believed to be in the public interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:53 pm
It has been contended that this kind of direction by courts will have a chilling effect on local governments when deciding to re-zone areas. [16] While on the one hand this may seem like a positive result since governments will think more before they make these important decisions, do we really want the government to tread lightly (or maybe not at all) if the overall effect of a re-zoning ordinance is a greater public good? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:25 am
He said he had no problem with a public official voicing criticism of the decisions of the Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm
And DOJ officials reportedly "told the White House that the case was a dead-end and that pursuing it would be a waste of time. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
That’s what makes this part of John’s post about the decision interesting: Relying on certain language in In re U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 26, 2011 Dickow v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
From there it’s up to the agency to determine if they’re public documents or not. [read post]
