Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption"
Results 241 - 260
of 13,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Harvard Law School’s Animal Law & Policy Clinic (Clinic) submitted a petition on June 9 to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), urging it to adopt a labeling approach for the emerging category of cell-based meat and poultry that “does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:26 pm
My point is not to portray adopted parents as poor victims — we’re not, we’re tremendously lucky. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Never before has there been a case with the potential to limit video game patents as with the In re Bilski appeal. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:02 am
And like their anti-free speech predecessors, they’re blind to the implications of these arguments. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:07 pm
Perhaps one of the issues that makes this idea so complicated, however, is that Domestic Relations Law § 70 does not define what a “parent” is. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
See In re Managed Care, 756 F.3d 1222, 1232 (11th Cir. 2014); Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
If the court adopts Miller’s argument that recusal does not constitute disability, the government suggests, this would strip the Department of Justice of its power to act on any matters for which the attorney general is required to recuse himself—an illogical result that, it asserts, Congress could [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
A state court does not have discretion to determine the applicability of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act or this chapter to a child custody proceeding based upon whether an Indian child is part of an existing Indian family.[21] Based upon this language, it does not appear that Iowa has or will adopt the existing Indian family doctrine. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 1:58 pm
” This OP (which does not use the verb “decides” and is not adopted under Article 41) has the effect of urging the US to carry out its commitments in the JCPOA, including the lifting of sanctions, but it does not require the US to do so as a matter of international law. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:33 am
Now, there’s a new twist – will the states adopt the campaign too? [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
California stands to lose a few millions dollars a year if it does not comply, state officials said. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Nor does their service as statewide representatives of the party and their related invocation of statewide injury to the Republican party and some unspecified Illinoisans on account of violations of the one-person, one-vote principle, solve the problem. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 3:30 am
Shortly afterwards, Debevoise published this 5-page memo – which does a great job of explaining why you’ll need to get your arms around AI if you’re advising boards. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
So when the Ninth Circuit this morning adopted as its own an opinion by District Judge King, I thought it nice.Just two minor points, however:(1) If you're simply adopting the district court's opinion, why does it take so long? [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
The law has since changed obviating the necessity for a re-adoption proceeding. [read post]
