Search for: "Jones v. England" Results 241 - 260 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  This happened to Seattle Seahawks tackle, Walter Jones, who had the tag imposed on him no less than three times. [29]  In this restructured solution, the franchise tag could potentially be limited to one season. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  The possibility of a special defence for bloggers was considered by Hugh Tomlinson QC at the 4 November 2010 conference in England on defamation law reform: “The second possible area for the development of a new defence relates to bloggers and others who produce material on the internet, often with fairly limited readerships, but who face the possibility of ruinously expensive libel actions. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 17 September, the Sun newspaper published on its cover an intrusive story about Ben Stokes, the England cricketer, and his family. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:20 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Jones, which means that if the hapless landlords get things wrong by even a single day the notice will be less than 2 months and all bets are off again. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
MITCHELL Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, c2009 HD2741 .C77463 2009 See Catalog Capital punishment IS THE DEATH PENALTY DYING? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
MITCHELL Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, c2009 HD2741 .C77463 2009 See Catalog Capital punishment IS THE DEATH PENALTY DYING? [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Invalidity Bones and the Cancellation of the Crystal SkullSkullduggery Rum Ltd v Globefill Incorporated [2020] ETMR 9 EUIPO Cancellation Division (October 2019)Ignore my misleading title – this is nothing to do with Indiana Jones and, in a rare positive decision for a non-traditional mark, did not lead to the cancellation of Globefill’s EUTM for the 3D shape illustrated below. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
The English text of the Treaty cedes sovereignty to the Queen of England; guarantees Māori “the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess,” with the Crown having the exclusive right of preemption with respect to land purchases; and provides Māori with “all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Briden Ch. commented: “the generality of the scheme has the support of the PCC, the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings and Historic England; the objections considered later in this judgment are directed to what might fairly be described as matters of detail” [1]. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He had even been granted a patent in England claiming the same discovery Edison’s team claimed to have made.But he was unable to retain the legal upper hand. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
Even Jones Day’s hiring partner has some advice. [read post]