Search for: "Matter of Compensation of Stone"
Results 241 - 260
of 307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
In this view of the matter, it has become imperative to examine what are the contours of the public interest litigation? [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
This only makes matters worse. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:45 pm
This only makes matters worse. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
United States The libel action by former Sheriff Joe Arpaio against CNN, Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post has been dismissed by a US District Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
Matt Furie first illustrated Pepe the Frog, a "blissfully stoned" and "peaceful frog-dude" in 2005. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:59 pm
It doesn't matter. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:59 pm
It doesn't matter. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:18 am
*The Fair Labor Standards Act requires that non-exempt employees be compensated whenever they are required or "suffered" to work. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
[28] Having the Chicago Cubs file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy serves as a legal maneuver to absolve the team from any possible future liability that the Tribune Company’s bankruptcy proceedings could bring. [29] In fact, this move serves more than a stepping stone to relieve creditors of their worry of compensation because a guarantee of ridding of the Tribune… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
Unfortunately, Alison Frankel thought that drivel worthy of mention, and completed the argument that Bainbridge didn’t have the stones to spell out: So why did Strine agree to grant such exorbitant fees? [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:54 pm
The measure would also eliminate piece rate compensation in the garment industry. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
When maxims are used at the trial court level, they are often espoused by lawyers in argument (and might make their way into a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in a Family Law matter, or even into Jury Instructions in a general Civil Law matter). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:45 am
Supreme Court, and what the North Carolina justices do will implicate how the nation’s highest court handles the matter. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:31 pm
To pull out one misshapen stone out of the grotesque structure is more likely to upset its present balance between adverse interests than to establish a rational edifice. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:48 am
Stone (which I wrote about here). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Under the new test, a court should look to whether the stated remedy in a contract is proportionate to the legitimate interests of the innocent party (which could go beyond the interest in merely being compensated for financial loss). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:28 am
” In re Marriage of Carrier, 773 NE 2d 657 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2002 It does not matter if the terms of the contract are fair or not. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
Lawyers (courts and legislators as well for that matter), for example, do not give theological advice and ought not to give authoritative pronouncements on economics or aesthetics. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am
Essentially that’s why scientific progress is linear within a given field: accelerating returns and exponential growth of scientific resources are merely *compensating* for the increasing difficulty of doing science that matters, the two canceling each other out into linear growth. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Jock McCulloch and Geoffrey Tweedale are labor historians, which means mostly they write about the issues of interest to industrial workers, from an unremittingly pro-labor and anti-management perspective. [read post]
